Read the article I published on Medium on April 7th, 2015.
Summary: Both discussions of government surveillance and basic income require knowledge of present technology to better understand, and both therefore require simplifications to a single question we can all understand.
Alan Watts answers the BIG question
"Money, Guilt, and the Machine" by Alan Watts
So this goes very deep into us. It goes deep, deep, deep . . .
Why I got into the idea of basic income and how we can go about implementing it
(The following is an edited transcript from my appearance on the Robot Overlordz podcast adapted for article form. You can read the original unedited transcript and also listen to the show in full here. A big thank you to Mike Johnston and Matt Bolton for the raw transcript and for having me on their show!)
The Origins of My Interest . . .
Episode 153 - "Basic Benjamin$!"
I was asked recently to be the guest for an episode of the Robot Overlordz podcast. As of today, the ep's now available to listen to over here.
My thanks to the guys over at Robot Overlordz for having me on the show! You can find more of their shows here.
How a BIG could be closer than we think
As I publish this on the eve of the 14th Annual North American Basic Income Congress in New York this weekend, which I will be attending thanks to the amazing support from my patrons, and even heading up social media interaction for (watch /r/BasicIncome for the live feed and #NABIG15 on Twitter), it occurs to me I need to share some of what . . .
The fallacy of "the luddite fallacy"
There are a lot of people wondering about the answer to this question, and drawing conclusions like 47% of all current jobs are at risk of being automated within 20 . . .
And Humans Already Need Not Apply
A conversation of increasing frequency, especially post-CGP Grey's excellent "Humans Need Not Apply":
Bill: We've been hearing about this technological unemployment crap for a long time. Every time someone has said, "It's different this time, " they've been wrong.
Ted: It's different . . .